不瘋狂，不活著。

比特幣現貨ETF還沒有最終消息，人們已經按耐不住了，但價格可能會很高。

首先，有人向中本聰的地址發送了數百萬美元的比特幣，人群驚呼領袖復活了。

1 月 7 日，一位不知名的富翁花費 1.5 BTC，約合 66,000 美元，在比特幣主網上刻了 8.93。

MB 的亂碼數據。

這個世界太瘋狂了，連SEC都是伴娘。

圖片描述：花費1.5 BTC的亂碼銘文

圖片來源：https://twitter.com/ord_io/status/1743768753991500155

數據永存??，Arweave獨門絕技不被市場認可

吃瓜群眾們震驚不已，也在猜測它的用途和意圖。

Arweave 創始人 Sam 還表示，“Arweave 存儲相同數量的文件僅需 0.06 美元，約為比特幣的百萬分之一，并且表示 Arweave 經歷了五年的運營，足以通過市場。”

說實話，Sam的說法并不完全是一個熱門話題。

Arweave 最初確實以其“永久存儲”概念而聞名，但其網絡普遍較小，社區也不團結。

至少艾里斯幾天前還在吃叉子。

，具體流程請參考我之前的文章：分叉意味著分裂，Arweave生態領袖Irys尋求獨立。

我還想順便提一下，在后續中，薩姆和艾里斯已經和好，不再分開。

然而，這場生態內部的公開沖突卻結束得如此倉促。

我無法發表評論。

至少在穩定性方面，Arweave還需要更長時間的測試，至少可以保證數據本身不會被分叉。

結果，比特幣的持久性得到了加強。

Arweave是否能保證200年的存儲時間還不確定。

不過大家都認為比特幣能活到2140年沒有什么大問題，畢竟比特幣經歷了五輪牛熊。

，萬億市值可不是鬧著玩的。

在比特幣現貨ETF最終結果出爐之前，還會有大量這樣的“花錢工作”。

會有人真的相信花費66000 X 7.17 = 473,220人民幣只是一個笑話嗎？

！

合理的猜測是，我認為這應該是ORDI的一場秀。

正如柯南所說，真理永遠只有一個。

當然，福爾摩斯也說過，當你排除了所有不可能的因素后，剩下的無論多么不可能，都一定是真相。

整部作品背后不排除第二批銘文的猜測

水流如意，鳥語黃昏。

Today's inscription market has reached an inflection point. According to CMC data, the trend of inscriptions has been declining in the past week. It seems that $100 has become an elusive dream. How to attract more attention?

One option is to work hard. 66,000 US dollars is a lot for individual retail investors, but for a certain project party or banker, it is difficult to say how high the public relations cost is, but it has been mentioned in major media. headlines, the "out of the circle" effect is unparalleled.

Moreover, the recent Bitcoin mainnet handling fees have plummeted by almost 80% in a week. Compared with 300+ BTC per day a week ago, they have been basically only about 150 BTC since January, which is nearly halved. On the 7th, it was only 70+ BTC, if it continues to fall like this, don’t wait until the Bitcoin spot ETF currency price soars to the sky, and even the inscription handling fees for drought and flood guarantees will be gone.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence). There is currently no evidence, and the whole article is only speculation:

• Anonymous address

• Invalid information (garbled data)

• Uses the Inscription protocol instead of the usual Bitcoin block burning method

• When the inscription ecology is weak

By sorting out the above information, the possibility of personal mistakes has been basically eliminated. If you are an old player OG who often uses inscriptions, you will not be unfamiliar with the operation methods of inscriptions, and you will definitely not make mistakes all the time. Then, if you retain important information personally, such a possibility The security is not great, because the information currently visible is completely garbled data, and the real method of encrypting data will not be so sloppy.

After ruling out the above possibilities, there are only two more reliable options:

1. Performance art, if you have money, it will be useless;

2. Public relations activities, old leeks who have gone through the era of sky-high NFT prices should be impressed. In 2021, Beeple's works were auctioned for US$69 million, writing the best footnote for the crazy last bull market;

The price is high enough to attract attention. In this reasoning logic, this is the more likely answer. Of course, if you are really heartbroken and crazy, then it is excusable, even if I am wrong.

Conclusion

The fiery inscription has always been a fluctuating quantum superposition state. It has gone through 3 small cycles so far, but the succession has been more perfect since October 2023. However, the current inscription is visible to the naked eye and is not very active. If you add a handful at this time With new wood, maybe we can continue the Indian Summer.

The above comments are all speculation. If there is any dispute, I am the one who is right

references:

1. Someone spent $66,000 to inscribe data onto Bitcoin. No one knows what it says.

2. https://twitter.com/ord_io/status/1743768753991500155

3. https://x.com/samecwilliams/status/1743920661431468192?s=20

熱點：BTC 中本聰