您可以在此處收聽或觀看此視頻

在上一課中，第 17 課，我們解釋了比特幣和以太坊經典 (ETC) 等工作量證明 (POW) 區塊鏈如何進行權力劃分，而權益證明 (POS) 鏈則沒有。

我們看到，在引入邪惡規則或爭議的情況下，“分裂權”或分離權如何為這些系統提供更高級別的安全性。

在本課程 18 的相關主題中，我們將了解為什么 POW 區塊鏈總是會受到持續的社會攻擊，因為在真正去中心化的系統中，沒有更高的權威來施加命令。

在技??術討論或升級爭議中，各派必須為自己想要的結果而戰。

此外，精英和政府并不認同真正的權力下放。

因此，毒性和極端主義是捍衛這些系統原則的必要姿態。

真正去中心化的系統永遠不會中心化

工作量證明是唯一能夠實現真正去中心化的信號系統。

在社會群體中，如果可以在不破壞系統的情況下實現去中心化，那么自由參與者總是會選擇去中心化。

集中化并不是人們所希望的狀態。

“投票”、“民主”和“共和”都不是理想的制度，它們只是我們能做的最不糟糕的事情。

但在工作證明系統中不能有暴君、國王、憲法、總統或國會。

它們是不可能的，因為參與者永遠不會選擇它們，因為它們沒有必要，而且他們總是更愿意分裂。

工作證明非治理

工作證明區塊鏈實際上在沒有治理的情況下工作得更好。

在這些系統中，“憲法”是區塊鏈協議本身。

以比特幣為例，礦工通過按照規則構建區塊來賺取比特幣，這是推動整個行業在全球范圍內完全去中心化的組織原則。

在以太坊經典中，它是可編程且無需許可的，這一事實指導世界各地的開發人員在其上構建應用程序，遵循分布式 EVM 設計，并自然地激勵他們捍衛它。

這就是為什么在 POW 區塊鏈中沒有領導者或管理員強加他們的意愿。

正是系統的價值和激勵引導著全球生態走向去中心化。

真正的去中心化意味著沒有權威

在真正去中心化的背景下，沒有仲裁者或權威來施加秩序。

如果沒有父輩人物或管理員在區塊鏈中強加秩序，那么在改變規則或實施升級時，各派系必須為他們想要的結果而奮斗。

因此，在這種情況下不可能進行“文明辯論”。

It is more or less like when children are with their parents or not. If their parents are present, then they will be much better behaved, but when the parents leave, then they may fight over candy or a sibling may pull the hair of the other.

Genuine decentralization means no authority, and no authority means that brute argumentative force becomes the name of the game.

No Authority Must Lead to Toxicity

If brute argumentative force becomes the name of the game to defend the principles of these systems, then the so called “toxicity” must be necessary.

Consequently, all those who criticize toxicity because it hurts their feelings are wrong.

Toxicity and maximalism are actually rational game-theoretical and evolutionarily stable behaviors in decentralized systems.

If toxicity is absent during periods of peace, and the factions seem to dissolve, it is not because they failed. It is because they were temporarily not needed.

But when new threats emerge again, which is inevitable, then, the toxic maximalists will re-emerge as well and will be welcomed as heroes.

Toxicity is good for POW blockchains.

The Proof of Stake Non-Toxicity Fallacy

Because proof of stake (POS) is centralized, then there are no social attacks on it.

Indeed, in POS participants can’t even split! Therefore, there is no argument to be had other than submitting to the authorities.

This is why so many people find POS “communities” so pleasant, because they seem friendly and inviting. But this is because they are after your money and they deceive you.

Although they may seem non-toxic in the surface, the evil in the systems is their centralization.

They control you, they submit you, and you have no recourse but to comply.

The perversion is orders of magnitude worse than the harmless “toxicity” in POW.

How BlackRock Will Be Neutralized

Many have cheered and welcomed the participation of the global asset management giant BlackRock in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Soon this globalist and passionate “Environmental, Social, and Governance” behemoth will also make incursions in other networks such as Ethereum, and eventually ETC.

Being BlackRock a faithful representative of elite philosophy and government power, it is inexorable that they will try to change the rules of these systems to centralize them.

However, because of the reasons explained in this and previous classes, POW blockchains are well equipped to defend their principles and integrity in front of these threats.

Toxicity will certainly push back at their attacks, and things such as the “right to split” and the sheer protection barrier that is POW will defend them.

Thank you for reading this article!

To learn more about ETC please go to: https://ethereumclassic.org

熱點：ETC 以太 以太坊 區塊鏈 POW